Mercurial > emacs
diff admin/FOR-RELEASE @ 78912:279728b97c49
*** empty log message ***
| author | Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:32:04 +0000 |
| parents | 10b783997d95 |
| children | fbe123a50f74 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/admin/FOR-RELEASE Fri Sep 28 03:31:02 2007 +0000 +++ b/admin/FOR-RELEASE Fri Sep 28 03:32:04 2007 +0000 @@ -41,6 +41,18 @@ reported on emacs-devel that he was not able to reproduce the bug on a GNU/Linux system. +* BUGS WAITING FOR MORE USER INPUT + +** undefined reference getopt_long +Report by Daniel C. Bastos <dbast0s@yahoo.com.br> on bug-gnu-emacs +from 2007-08-27. Impossible to procede without more input from OP (as +of 20070912, emails are bouncing) or someone else who can reproduce this. +http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-08/msg01497.html + +** TAGS buffer generates spurious undo warnings +Waiting for recipe to produce these warnings. +http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2007-09/msg00070.html + * BUGS ** ams@gnu.org, 9 July: eshell and external commands @@ -54,12 +66,6 @@ builds where the behavior can be observed, compare: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-09/msg00446.html -** undefined reference getopt_long -Report by Daniel C. Bastos <dbast0s@yahoo.com.br> on bug-gnu-emacs -from 2007-08-27. Impossible to procede without more input from OP (as -of 20070912, emails are bouncing) or someone else who can reproduce this. -http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-08/msg01497.html - ** Frame title no more updated after calling `set-frame-configuration' Report by Sebastien Rocca Serra <sroccaserra@gmail.com> on emacs-devel from 2007-08-30. martin rudalics has a potential patch. @@ -76,14 +82,6 @@ alloc.c, or whether configure should abort. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2007-09/msg00055.html -** TAGS buffer generates spurious undo warnings -Waiting for recipe to produce these warnings. -http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2007-09/msg00070.html - -** latex mode, nexted subscripts are unreadable -Only happens with some ("poorly designed") fonts. -http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2007-09/msg00020.html - * FIXES FOR EMACS 22.3 Here we list any small fixes that arrived too late for Emacs 22.2, but