Mercurial > emacs
annotate etc/LPF @ 55338:3fe6300a67bf
*** empty log message ***
| author | Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org> |
|---|---|
| date | Mon, 03 May 2004 13:51:59 +0000 |
| parents | 885f63d7c285 |
| children |
| rev | line source |
|---|---|
| 25853 | 1 Protect Your Freedom to Write Programs |
| 2 Join the League for Programming Freedom | |
| 3 (Version of February 3, 1994) | |
| 4 | |
| 5 Ten years ago, programmers were allowed to write programs using all | |
| 6 the techniques they knew, and providing whatever features they felt | |
| 7 were useful. This is no longer the case. New monopolies, known as | |
| 8 software patents and interface copyrights, have taken away our freedom | |
| 9 of expression and our ability to do a good job. | |
| 10 | |
| 11 "Look and feel" lawsuits attempt to monopolize well-known command | |
| 12 languages; some have succeeded. Copyrights on command languages | |
| 13 enforce gratuitous incompatibility, close opportunities for | |
| 14 competition, and stifle incremental improvements. | |
| 15 | |
| 16 Software patents are even more dangerous; they make every design | |
| 17 decision in the development of a program carry a risk of a lawsuit, | |
| 18 with draconian pretrial seizure. It is difficult and expensive to | |
| 19 find out whether the techniques you consider using are patented; it is | |
| 20 impossible to find out whether they will be patented in the future. | |
| 21 | |
| 22 The League for Programming Freedom is a grass-roots organization of | |
| 23 professors, students, businessmen, programmers and users dedicated to | |
| 24 bringing back the freedom to write programs. The League is not | |
| 25 opposed to the legal system that Congress expressly established for | |
| 26 software--copyright on individual programs. Our aim is to reverse the | |
| 27 recent changes that prevent programmers from doing their work. | |
| 28 | |
| 29 The League works to abolish the new monopolies by publishing articles, | |
| 30 talking with public officials, denouncing egregious offenders, and | |
| 31 filing amicus curiae briefs, most notably against Lotus in its suit | |
| 32 against Borland. We testified twice at the recent Patent Office | |
| 33 hearings on software patents. We welcome suggestions for other | |
| 34 activities, as well as help in carrying them out. | |
| 35 | |
| 36 | |
|
50442
885f63d7c285
Don't ask people to join the LPF. Ask for a volunteer to reactivate it.
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
49600
diff
changeset
|
37 (Added 2003) The League for Programming Freedom is inactive nowadays, |
|
885f63d7c285
Don't ask people to join the LPF. Ask for a volunteer to reactivate it.
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
49600
diff
changeset
|
38 though its web site www.programming-freedom.org is still maintained. |
|
885f63d7c285
Don't ask people to join the LPF. Ask for a volunteer to reactivate it.
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
49600
diff
changeset
|
39 It would be very useful to find a person who could take the initiative |
|
885f63d7c285
Don't ask people to join the LPF. Ask for a volunteer to reactivate it.
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
49600
diff
changeset
|
40 to get the LPF operating again. It will be a substantial job, |
|
885f63d7c285
Don't ask people to join the LPF. Ask for a volunteer to reactivate it.
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
49600
diff
changeset
|
41 requiring persistence and working with a lawyer. If you want to do |
|
885f63d7c285
Don't ask people to join the LPF. Ask for a volunteer to reactivate it.
Richard M. Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
parents:
49600
diff
changeset
|
42 it, please write to rms@gnu.org. |
| 25853 | 43 |
